As the state of California is frequently hit by severe record drought in which later on became the best fertile ground for artificial grass. So here are some pros and cons of using Artificial Grass.

A Greener Alternative to Natural Grass

Greener and the water saving grass has suddenly become an acceptable alternative than to real grass for most Californians. As a result, The synthetic turf business boomed all over the Golden State. For those who want greener, no-maintenance lawns without incurring the wrath of water conservationists or the state government, consider artificial grass as a smart solution.

What’s Driving Growth?

In 2015, Governor Jerry Brown ordered the state’s first mandatory watering limitations in history. Lawn watering usually accounts for one-third of urban water use, that’s why artificial grass is a practical choice for reducing water consumption. Since the restrictions took place, local business has been buying nonstop from local turf manufacturers and retailers.

Who’s Buying It?

The market ranges from the upper to the middle class – pretty much anyone who appreciates a greener lawn while carrying within the state’s forceful watering restrictions. Those who have tried synthetic grass said newer versions surpassed the original AstroTurf, bearing a closer likeness to lush, natural grass only without the constant need for watering and mowing.

Who’s Not Buying It?

Not everyone thinks the artificial grass is the best solution. Ironically, they refer to the environment as the reason. Many preservation groups insist that artificial turf does little to promote soil health. Some claim it can lead to excessive water runoff. Due to these concerns, the United States Environmental Protection Agency started an investigation in the potential health risks of artificial turf used on sports fields. Other sources discuss rain barrels as another means of conserving water.

Start Free Estimate

X
Get Free Estimate